Present: S. Versluis, M. Ferris-Young, C. Gornowich, J. Hickey,
Chairman; D. Brown, M. Huizenga, C. Rypma, and T. Greeno. Absent: M.
Houseman. Also Present: Al Pennington, Moore & Bruggink, F. Wash,
Planning Director, and
P. Dlouhy, Planning Asst.
Chairman Hickey opened the meeting and M. Huizenga gave the
invocation.
General Public Comment
Member Versluis stated that the Walgreens-Belle Tire rezone was well
received by the City Commission at their Monday night meeting. He
related that they were impressed on how we handled that issue.
Case #05-442 – West Michigan Family Medicine – Site
Plan Review
The above-noted agenda item is tabled at the applicant’s request
until December 7, 2005.
Case #05-443 – KFC Restaurant – 3911 Lake Michigan Dr.
– Public Hearing
Chairman Hickey read the request for a rezoning from ORP, Office,
Research & Parking to C-1 Location Commercial, for property located at
3911 Lake Michigan Dr.
Motion by C. Gornowich, supported by M. A. Ferris, to receive and
file the written petition and correspondence in opposition to the
rezoning, all received by the City on 11-16-05. Motion carried.
Planner Wash gave a Powerpoint presentation of the applicant’s
request for the rezoning from ORP to C-1, including the procedural
aspects associated with the rezoning, as well as staff’s responsibility
to analyze the request and provide the reports, maps, etc. Wash also
reviewed aerial maps of the subject parcel and surrounding properties
showing the zoning and land uses as follows: to the east, Huntington
Bank, to the west, service office building, to the north, Barkwood
Condos, to the south, Wendy’s, a retail strip mall, all serviced by
M-45, a major regional traffic mover. He related that the site falls
within an area master planned for community commercial uses, the site is
along a developed retail-service strip and is bordered by office-retail
service uses and multi-family housing.
Wash reviewed the one entrance to the Barkwood Condos, which should
have been designed at one time to have a back entrance out via Hampton
Lakes Apartments. Wash commented that the condos probably didn’t want
the connection due to too much traffic volume.
Motion by S. Versluis, supported by D. Brown, to open the public
hearing. Motion carried.
Attorney John Inhulson, representing the applicant, stated that the
Planning Commission needs to focus on the rezoning issues and not the
site plan issues at this point. He stated that this area is master
planned for community commercial. There are many commercial uses across
the street and he feels this is an appropriate area to recommend for
rezoning to C-1.
Sheryl Fredricks, 471 Barkwood, strongly urged the Planning
Commission not to recommend rezoning at 3911 Lake Michigan Dr. due to
increased traffic over the years, numerous exits and entrances very
close together, difficult to enter and exit Barkwood Condominiums. The
40 individual homeowners do not want to deal with the noise, lights,
traffic, smells, and trash issues. She asked the Planning Commission not
to stray from the master plan to benefit the applicant.
Marilyn Verde, Barkwood resident, stated with MSU coming to Grand
Rapids, she felt that the subject property would be suited for a medical
building. She doesn’t want a restaurant at this location.
Clarence Bouws, 451 Barkwood, stated he looked at several KFC’s and
noticed that the garbage pits are placed far away from the main
building. He fears the placement 20 feet from the Barkwood Condos with
the smells, it would be a disaster to rezone as it is not the place for
a KFC. He stated it is currently zoned for office and could be an
excellent place for an office building.
Dr. Dan Arsulowicz, owner of 3935 Lake Michigan Dr., immediately west
of the subject property. He stated that across the street is Wendy’s but
there is a road and buffer between Wendy’s and the apartment complex. He
realizes that the property will be developed, but prefers it with the
ORP zoning designation as it is now.
Mike McKown, 481 Barkwood, stated if not a KFC, it could be something
even worse. With the trash areas out in the back, bright lights, he
asked what the City does to prevent the lighting from shining on
residents, and what rights do the residents have with the smells? He
asked the Planning Commission to leave the zoning as is to honor the
neighbors. With the heavy traffic along M-45, they do not need another
entrance or exit on a small piece of property for people to be able to
stop on icy roads at the light at Kinney. He asked if Huntington Bank
was planning to move?
Chairman Hickey stated that he wasn’t aware of plans for Huntington
to move. He indicated that Fifth Third Bank is going to move next to
Meijer, and Independent Bank is coming.
Theresa Bilski, 483 Barkwood, stated that her biggest concern is the
noise and lighting, and the mature trees on this piece of property which
she hates to see taken out and prefers the green space. She asked the
Planning Commission to take those things under consideration.
A resident of 473 Barkwood, stated she has the same concerns, she is
against the rezoning, and is concerned about her property value with a
KFC Restaurant.
Tiffany Rice, Manager of the Huntington Bank Office, stated that they
did not receive a notice about the meeting. Planner Wash stated that
Huntington Bank, in Columbus, Ohio did receive the notice, according to
State Law.
A Barkwood Condominium resident stated that she was looking at the
differences between the C-1 and ORP zoning districts and wondered if it
were rezoned would variances be necessary?
John Rider, 492 Barkwood, stated that the second story buildings will
likely smell the odors and have lighting issues with being only 20 feet
away from the closest building.
Motion by S. Versluis, supported by C. Rypma, to close the public
hearing. Motion carried.
Member Gornowich asked about the history of the subject parcel and
its ORP zoning classification. Chairman Hickey stated that in the 1950’s
a tornado picked up this house and spun it around. He stated that the
Field’s Fabrics was zoned commercial and at that time the rest of the
properties along this stretch down to Kramer Entertainment was rezoned
to ORP as a buffer.
Chairman Hickey stated that with the excessive amount of driveways
along this stretch from Kinney back to the motel, the traffic at 5 p.m.
is very dangerous for the people from Barkwood to exit out of. He
understands that there are 1,500 cars daily coming out of MMPC. He asked
how many stops per day does KFC anticipate coming in there?
Attorney Inhulson related that he doesn’t have the traffic figures.
He stated that access is controlled by MDOT and it is not appropriate to
discuss the driveway locations. He stated that it is not permissible to
talk about KFC, only the rezoning and if it is consistent with the
zoning ordinance and the master plan. He stated that all of the other
issues are important to consider but they are site plan issues, and this
is a rezoning application.
Chairman Hickey stated that the City of Walker DDA is doing a market
study and the idea to change this to a C-1 zone at this time is not in
our best interest. Hickey stated that he is conscious of the traffic
situation and he doesn’t want to make it worse. He felt that we need
access management along this side of
M-45, with 8-10 driveways to the Lake Michigan Dr./Kinney
intersection. He stated that there is no logical reason to rezone this
property. With the ORP zone, there are no smells, no added traffic. With
the C-1 Zoning District, we do not know what exactly will go in there.
If not KFC, anything in the C-1 zone could go in.
Member Gornowich agreed with Chairman Hickey and the neighbors. She
stated that access is an MDOT issue. Based on adjacent uses, she doesn’t
see that this property could not be used as currently zoned.
Member Versluis stated when he looks at that stretch, it takes on an
office character, and it seems totally out of character to put a
restaurant in there. Standale has a variety of businesses, and he
doesn’t want it to become a boulevard of restaurants. He wants Standale
to become something unique. He feels that we have our fair share of fast
food restaurants, and there is no compelling reason to change the zoning
on it. He stated that we are not shutting the door to restaurants.
Chairman Hickey stated that there are sites along M-45 for building
of restaurants available already zoned commercial.
Member Greeno stated that if this was becoming a downtown, he could
see it. But he doesn’t see that happening. He would like Standale to
become downtown Walker. He agrees with Chairman Hickey that we have
plenty of other areas for restaurants by the new Meijer at M-45 & M-11.
Member Versluis stated we will be looking at the entire DDA district
with the market study.
Member Ferris asked if the ORP zoning district still supports the
updates to the 1998 master plan? Planner Wash stated that the master
plan is a broad brush approach and is not parcel specific. He stated
that there is no administrative conflict between the ORP zone and the
1998 Master Plan.
Member Rypma stated that Lake Michigan Dr. could handle the traffic
associated with a fast food restaurant. The property owner has the right
to cut down the trees. He doesn’t feel that a KFC fits in with the
character of the neighborhood, and there are logical reasons to keep it
zoned ORP.
Motion by C. Gornowich, supported by S. Versluis, to recommend denial
of the rezoning for 3911 Lake Michigan Drive from ORP to C-1 Local
Commercial to the Walker City Commission. Motion carried unanimously.
8-0
Case #05-445 – Erickson’s Inc. – 3132 3 Mile Rd. -
Site Plan Review
Chairman Hickey read the application requesting site plan approval to
allow the installation of an equipment yard, to be used for crane parts
and storage, at 3132 3 Mile Road.
Planner Wash reviewed the staff report, the site plan and REGIS map.
Wash related that Mr. Erickson proposes to construct a 570’ x 295’
outdoor storage yard for his crane parts. There is no building proposed
at this time. Wash related that Mr. Erickson currently operates a large
crane business just to the south of this site. Wash then reviewed the
procedural aspects of the request.
Wash related that this is mostly an engineering project until a
building is proposed. He indicated that currently Erickson Drive is a
pre-existing, non-conforming private street. Wash stated that as a
condition of approval, a note should be added to the plan stating that
the proposed land divisions shown on the site plan must be revised and
approved by the City of Walker Assessor. Staff supports approval of the
project.
Al Pennington, of Moore & Bruggink, reviewed the comments in his memo
dated 11-11-05 as follows:
The drive approach at Three Mile Road needs to be repaired.
The drive approach to the storage yard should be paved, with
flares where it matches Erickson Drive.
Stormwater detention of the site was provided when the
surrounding properties were developed. At that time the detention
requirements were for storage of a 25-year storm event. Considering
that the site will have an aggregate surface, which is somewhat
pervious, the existing stormwater detention volume will suffice. As
the site is further developed with buildings and pavement,
additional stormwater will be required.
Al Pennington related that the City of Grand Rapids will be
constructing a sanitary trunk sewer in Erickson Drive in the next couple
of years. The sanitary sewer will require complete replacement of the
street. Consideration should be given to making Erickson Drive a public
street at the time the sewer is constructed.
Steve Erickson agreed that the drive approach at Three Mile Road
needs to be fixed. He related that they are working with Land Matters on
the sewer. He stated that the approach to the driveway can be done in
concrete. Erickson related that they plan to do a 80,000 square foot
warehouse in 2007, and they will need to look at the retention pond now
and incorporate it into their plans. Al Pennington felt it would make
sense to do with the earth moving operation. He stated that the existing
detention is acceptable for what is being proposed at this time. We
could work with the retention if this site were paved. Erickson related
that they are going to raise the existing manhole to the property
elevation. Al Pennington stated that the site as proposed is gravel. If
paved would be impervious and bump it over the limit. He felt they could
talk about it prior to the site being paved.
Member Gornowich talked about a formal agreement with the property
owner. If we make that condition moving the access on 3 Mile does he
have any leverage with those property owners? Mr. Erickson stated that
Jack Dykstra owns the property.
Al Pennington reiterated that it would be a great opportunity to redo
the road and make it a public street, and bring it up to public
standards and provide better access to the businesses back there.
Chairman Hickey asked about special assessments? Al Pennington stated
that there is an existing sewer now. They are just increasing the
capacity of the sewer and replacing the existing pavement. There would
be no special assessments for that, but possible for curb and gutter.
The project is being funded by all sewage users in the district. Al
stated that it could be a benefit to them and the City as well.
Motion by C. Gornowich, supported by T. Greeno, to approve the site
plan dated 10-26-05 for the Erickson’s storage yard, as it does meet the
standards set forth in the City of Walker Zoning Ordinance with the
following conditions of site plan approval:
The applicant agrees to all conditions noted in the City Planning
Director’s letter dated 11-8-05.
The applicant agrees to all conditions noted in the City
Engineer’s letter dated 11-3-05 and Al Pennington’s letter dated
11-11-05.
Motion carried unanimously. 8-0.
Commissioner and Staff Update
Frank Wash reminded the Planning Commission about the upcoming master
plan meeting #2 for South Walker from 6:00-8:30 p.m. on November 30th in
the City Commission Chambers. There will be a presentation from Al
Pennington and Scott Conners about the possibility of water and sewer
(pros and cons). Frank Wash to review pros and cons from first meeting,
and Val Lazdins to discuss 2 or 3 land use alternatives.
Adjournment
Motion by T. Greeno, supported by D. Brown, to adjourn at 8:30 p.m.
Motion carried.
__________________________ _______________________________
Administrative Approval Carol Gornowich, Secretary