Members Present: B. Brown, T. Byle, T. Korfhage, J. Hickey, Chairman;
C. Rypma, A. Parent. Absent: C. Gornowich, T. Schweitzer, and M.
Huizenga. Also Present: F. Wash, Planning Director, S. Conners, City
Engineer; and P. Dlouhy, CDD Assistant.
Chairman Hickey opened the meeting and Member Rypma gave the
invocation.
Approval of Minutes – July 15, 2009
Motion by A. Parent, supported by D Brown, to approve the minutes as
printed. Motion carried unanimously.
General Public Comment
There were no comments at this time.
Case #09-562 – Orchard Hill Church – Public Hearing
Chairman Hickey read the application requesting a special exception
use permit, filed by Orchard Hill Church, located at 1465 – 3 Mile Rd.,
N.W., (PPN #41-13-02-351-002) to lease space in their newest wing to a
45-student, grades K-8 private school.
Motion by T. Byle, supported by T. Korfhage, to open the public
hearing. Motion carried.
Planner Wash reviewed REGIS photography of the site. Wash reviewed
the staff report and related that the reason for the special exception
request is not for a building addition or changes to the site, but
because a private school is proposed.
Wash related that the site is located north of 3 Mile Road and east
of Bristol Avenue. He reviewed surrounding land uses and indicated that
the lot is located across the street from Fire Station #3. Wash related
that there is an existing church on the site.
Wash indicated that the site is zoned SA, Residential District. In
the ordinance, a public or private school is allowed as a special
exception use via planning commission review and approval.
Planner Wash stated that the planning commission was provided with
floor plans for clarification of where the private school classrooms and
ancillary facilities would be located. Wash noted that the existing
daycare operation would continue within the building.
Scott Conners reviewed his engineering report. He related that the
last addition to this site was to result in a minimum detention volume
of 2.22 acre feet and only 1.91 acre-feet was constructed. The plan now
calls for upgrading the pond volume to meet the previous requirements.
Scott Conners related that after reviewing the approved 2004
stormwater calculations, it appears that the outlet structure may not
have been built to the design standards. It was determined that the
outlet structure was simply never installed. These deficiencies should
be resolved before the special exception is approved or as a conditional
of approval.
Chairman Hickey asked if there should be 2.2 acre feet detention
volume? Scott stated yes, at a minimum.
Frank Harper, church administrator, stated that a letter of credit is
in process and they will have it by this Friday, August 21st,
to cover improvements to the detention pond. Mr. Harper indicated that
the current daycare learning center is in a separate section of the
building. The proposed school will be located in the new wing that was
constructed in 2004, located in the upper level. The existing daycare is
located in the lower level of the building.
Chairman Hickey asked who would be in charge of the private school?
Peter Marth, headmaster of the school was present. He indicated that
they will have approximately 45 students, (currently 41), 6 on-site
staff members, and approximately 2 parent volunteers.
Chairman Hickey asked if there would be any conflicts between hours
of operation and Sunday church services? Peter Marth stated no, the
school would have the same hours as the learning center, and nothing on
Sunday.
Chairman Hickey asked about staff parking spots and where the
children will be dropped off? Peter Marth stated that they will have
8-10 parking spots for staff and the children will be dropped off behind
the building.
Member Korfhage asked if they plan to expand the school? Peter Marth
stated they are currently proposing 45 students. Member Korfhage asked
where does that leave the planning commission; if the school grows, will
they have to come back to us? Planner Wash stated yes, if the special
exception permit limits the number of students.
Member Rypma asked if they will modify the existing playground? Frank
Harper stated no, there would be no additional playground areas. He
indicated that the entrance for the school is in the back, on the far
right side and would be dedicated for school use.
Member Byle stated that the church is the applicant for 45 students.
He asked who the tenant is? If the school gets 52 students, will they
come back to the planning commission? Planner Wash stated if the school
exceeds the approved number of students, the applicant will have to come
back to the planning commission to amend their use permit.
Member Korfhage asked if they plan on building a future school at
this location? Frank Harper stated no, they have a lease agreement for
interior space for a private school. Mr. Harper indicated that they have
6 classrooms that will hold 25 students and the school is only intending
on occupying 4 classrooms. The total capacity is 150 maximum.
Planner Wash felt that it is a good idea to put a limit on the
student numbers. The Planning Commission could consider a limit of 45
students, since that is the number the applicant has requested.
Member Rypma asked if the school is totally tuition supported? Peter
Marth stated yes.
Member Parent asked where the school is meeting now? Mr. Marth stated
that they have been meeting informally at another location and are
planning for this location. Parent asked if there will be a need for
signage? Peter Marth stated not at this time.
Member Rypma asked where are the families based? Mr. Marth stated
Kentwood, Caledonia, Jenison and Ada.
Member Rypma asked what sets this school apart from a traditional
Christian school? Peter Marth stated that Trinita’s Classical School
will be leasing the space. He related that this is an ecumenical
Christian school and open to all denominations. Marth stated that there
is a tradition of logic and debate, Greek, Latin, uniforms, and
traditional teaching in order to grow up as good, respectable citizens.
Member Byle asked about way-finding in an emergency situation?
Planner Wash stated that the church’s existing ground sign is
nonconforming because of size. Wash discussed possibly having a suite
number, and that they will have to arrange that with our assessing
office. Or the applicant may want something separate from the main
address for emergency purposes. Wash then suggested a directional sign
with an arrow at the driveway. If the sign requires electricity, they
would have to apply for an electrical permit.
Chairman Hickey asked if there was a concern using the westerly
driveway? Scott Conners stated that it will be a small amount of
vehicles and there is not too much of a concern.
Chairman Hickey asked if Scott Conners has talked with Moore and
Bruggink about the stormwater volume? Scott stated no.
Member Byle asked that if Conners was satisfied with the letter of
credit? Scott stated that he does not have an issue with the church; it
was more of an issue with the contractor not getting the work done.
Scott stated that if he receives a proper letter of credit or bond to
get the stormwater basin work completed, he is ok with it.
Motion by A. Parent, supported by T. Byle, to close the public
hearing. Motion carried.
Frank Harper asked if the planning commission would waive the 10-tree
staff requirement along the right-of-way in lieu of extensive on-site
landscaping around the church? There was much discussion followed by a
decision to waive the 10-tree requirement and to be in favor of the
landscape plan for on-site landscaping around the church building.
Chairman Hickey read a letter of support into the record from
Attorney David Anderson.
Motion by T. Korfhage, supported by T. Byle, to approve the special
exception use permit for a 45-student, grades K-8 private school within
the existing Orchard Hill Reformed Church building at 1465 – 3 Mile
Road, NW (PPN 41-13-02-351-002), with the following Findings of Fact:
The establishment, maintenance, location or operation of the
private school will not be detrimental to or endanger the public
because it will be similar in hours of operation to the existing
daycare facility.
The use is compatible with the intent of the SA zoning district
and will not change the essential character of the surrounding area
because the property is currently used as an educational daycare
facility.
The use will not be injurious to the use or enjoyment of other
property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes permitted, will
not substantially diminish or impair property values within the
area, and will not result in any significant adverse impact on the
natural environment because the private school will be using the
existing building, and there are plenty of green areas and open
spaces on site.
The establishment, maintenance, location or operation of the use
will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement
of surrounding property for uses permitted in the SA district
because of the site’s large green areas and the private school will
be housed within the existing building.
Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary
services or facilities have been or will be provided such that the
use will not place demands on public services or facilities in
excess of capacity because of the current building capacity and the
private school will not be used on Sundays.
The use will, in all other respects, conform to the applicable
regulations of the zoning district in which it is located,
conditions imposed on approval, and all other applicable provisions
of law, ordinance or statute.
Special Exception Use Permit Condition of Approval
Maximum number of students not to exceed 45.
Motion carried 6-0.
Motion by T. Korfhage, supported by T. Byle, to approve the submitted
site plans for a 45-student, grades K-8 private school within the
existing Orchard Hill Reformed Church building at 1465 – 3 Mile Road NW
(PPN #41-13-02-351-002), as the plans do meet the standards set forth in
the City of Walker Zoning Ordinance, with the following Conditions of
Site Plan Approval:
The applicant agrees to all conditions noted in the City Planning
Director’s letter dated 8-11-09.
The applicant agrees to all conditions noted in the City
Engineer’s letter dated 8-12-09.
The requirement for street trees along 3 Mile Road was deleted in
favor of onsite landscaping around the church.
Motion carried unanimously 6-0.
Case #09-564: West Michigan Shared Laundry – Site Plan
Review
Chairman Hickey read the application requesting consideration of a
site plan submitted by West Michigan Shared Hospital Laundry for a
32,225 sq. ft. production addition and a 1,122 sq. ft. office addition
to the existing building, located at 3003 Walkent Dr.
Planner Wash reviewed his staff report, including an aerial overview
of the subject parcel, located north of 3 Mile Road in the Walkent
Industrial Park. The subject parcel is zoned ML – Light Industrial.
Planner Wash related that this item has been before the Zoning Board
of Appeals and granted a variance for a front setback encroachment on
Walkent Ct.
Wash related that the applicant is requesting two building
expansions: a 32,225 sq. ft. addition will allow improved workflow and
handling of hospital laundry and the 1,122 sq. ft. addition will allow
more office space.
Planner Wash read a letter into the record from the adjacent property
owner, Thomas Koster, Realvesco Properties, asked for consideration of
additional pine trees to buffer the new loading docks on Walkent Court
and additional pine trees to buffer the retaining wall on the north lot
line.
Wash reviewed his staff analysis and recommendations. He indicated
that the office elevation includes a significant amount of EIFS. Wash
stated that the planning commission may consider requiring a different
material in place of EIFS, such as brick, block, hard coat stucco,
textured and colored concrete, etc.
Planner Wash stated that the applicant is requesting deferment of 14
parking spaces. The ordinance does not specifically allow deferred
parking. He recommended that all 14 spaces be constructed as part of the
expansion process as a condition of site plan approval.
Wash reviewed the truck turning template issue for the proposed dock
addition and possible conflict with the driveway curb with the planning
commission.
Wash related that with regard to the street trees along Walkent
Court, they should be changed from "Silver Maple" to "Autumn Blaze
Maple" as a condition of site plan approval.
He related that the applicant received a front yard setback variance
from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the 32,225 sq. ft. addition.
Scott Conners then reviewed the engineering report dated 8-12-09,
including the need for soil testing reports to ensure that the fill is
engineered and capable of supporting this 10’ of fill material and the
building.
Conners related that the truck turning movements seem to conflict
with a number of parking spots in the southwestern parking area. These
should be striped as "no parking" or reconfigured to ensure that truck
turning movements are available.
Scott Conners related that his recommendation for an additional storm
sewer manhole be placed to provide a more efficient angle of entry for
the rooftop rain water.
Scott Conners related that there are two open cuts proposed for sewer
connections. Both locations will limit access to a cul-de-sac. The
developer should be prepared to perform these connections on a weekend
and with the cooperation of the businesses on the restricted end of the
cul-de-sac. Access to those buildings must be maintained during the
hours of operation.
Conners has requested that the plan be updated to show the adjacent
driveways and hydrants along Walkent Court.
Conners indicated that the detention calculation plans for the pond
need to be sealed with the firm name, engineer name, and date clearly
shown.
Chairman Hickey stated that this became a more expensive project with
25,000 yards of fill in back. Hickey asked who the structural engineer
was for the project? Kurt Adams, project manager, stated Northern
Structurals is the structural engineer. Hickey asked about the adequacy
of the retaining wall? Mr. Adams replied that the structural engineer is
satisfied. They had looked at different options and this is the best
scenario.
With respect to parking, Mr. Adams stated that they tried not to
overdesign the parking layout for maximum spaces based on the needs of
the user.
Chairman Hickey asked where the main utilities will be located? Kurt
Adams stated that all utilities are off the parking lot side.
Member Korfhage asked if there will be jobs added? Mr. Adams stated
possibly 16, plus construction jobs.
Member Brown asked the applicant what EIFS is? Kurt Adams stated is
it basically a stucco product.
Mr. Adams reviewed an elevation drawing showing examples of the
proposed EIFS on the north and east walls.
Planner Wash stated that the architectural standards are more
flexible in the industrial zone. It was determined that the balance of
the building materials would include metal siding and white brick with a
4-foot bump wall. The applicant stated that they are dealing with an
existing building and they would be matching it with the addition.
Chairman Hickey asked how many windows are proposed on the addition
side of the building? It was determined that four daylight windows
across the back of the building are proposed near the laundry storage
supply by the roof.
Member Byle stated that on the northwesterly wall overlooking the
pond, no one from the public is going to see it. Kurt Adams stated that
he wants as much daylight as possible for increased productivity.
Member Korfhage asked what size the high horizontal windows will be?
Kurt Adams stated either 4x4 or 6x4 foot windows spaced throughout.
Planner Wash reviewed the additional landscaped areas to address the
docks at Walkent Ct. Wash related that the trees on-site are proposed to
be removed. He stated that there is a landscaping requirement to buffer
the edge of the pond and add street trees. He felt that the linear
placement of trees makes sense. Wash asked Mr. Adams to explain what the
retaining wall would look like. He related it would be modular prefab
block with textured-colored bases on them.
Chairman Hickey asked Mr. Adams to work with Scott Conners regarding
the contours, and with Frank Wash regarding the trees. Mr. Adams stated
that he would like to have excluded the street trees.
Planner Wash stated that if parking spaces become an issue, the
applicant will be required to install parking. Planner Wash noted if the
site became an industrial warehouse, they wouldn’t need the currently
required parking. Wash stated that the city can require 14 spaces if
overflow parking becomes a problem.
Member Parent felt that based on what is there now, he feels the
proposed parking will be appropriate.
Member Rypma asked if the question was answered regarding the tree
buffer along the neighbor’s property? Scott Conners stated that from a
planning standpoint, we have been taking on a tree planting initiative.
He felt that it is a big thing to say we don’t want trees in the
right-of-way. If you pick the right trees, it is a good thing. He felt
that there would be long term implications about waiving the tree
regulations. Member Korfhage added that he agrees because Walker Court
is a dead end and an industrial area.
Member Byle stated he agrees with waiving the street trees along the
Walker Court side. From a highway perspective, trees belong outside of
the right-of-way.
Member Rypma stated he is ok without them, but would prefer to see
the trees there.
Motion by C. Rypma, supported by D. Brown, to approve the submitted
site plans for the West Michigan Shared Hospital Laundry expansion at
3003 Walkent Drive (PPN 41-13-03-412-002), as it does meet the standards
set forth in the City of Walker Zoning Ordinance, with the conditions of
site plan approval:
The applicant agrees to all conditions noted in the City Planning
Director’s letter dated 8-11-09.
The applicant agrees to all conditions noted in the City
Engineer’s letter dated 8-12-09.
Wider driveway on Walkent Court with driveway variance, per
engineering.
Extra landscaping pod to buffer new docks along Walkent Court.
Staff street tree recommendation along Walkent Court is waived.
Motion carried 6-0.
Case #09-560 – Golden Corral Restaurant – Site Plan
Review
Chairman Hickey read the application requesting consideration of a
site plan submitted by Processing Specialties LLC, for a proposed 11,087
sq. ft. Golden Corral Restaurant, located at 3461 Alpine Ave.
Planner Wash reviewed the staff report. He provided aerial
orientation to the site and related that the subject parcel is the
former Jack Keller Used Car site, located on the corner of Alpine Ave.
and Old Orchard. Planner Wash related that the subject site is zoned
C-4, Outdoor Commercial District.
Wash reviewed existing adjacent land uses in this urban setting with
Old Orchard Apartments to the west. Cross access between parking lots is
an important detail with this plan. Wash related that the existing
building will be taken down and a new structure built to house the
restaurant.
Wash reviewed the staff analysis and recommendations. He related that
two zoning variances have been applied for via the Zoning Board of
Appeals. One is a side yard setback on the north; the other is for a
reduced number of parking spaces. Wash related that the zoning ordinance
requires 226 parking spaces and Golden Corral will ask the ZBA to
approve 170 spaces.
Wash stated that the property lines should be bold and labeled on all
site plan sheets, as a condition of approval.
He related that landscaping and site lighting will be new, along with
ADA/pedestrian access improvements from the Route #9 public bus stop,
through the parking lot and to the front door. Wash related that the
plans show a new bus shelter and pad area on the Golden Corral lot. An
easement will be required from the applicants to the Rapid/ITP.
(Condition of Site Plan Approval)
Wash related that the grade is steep between Outback Restaurant and
this site in the front. There will be a reciprocal cross access easement
and construction easement with respect to the rear parking lot
connection from Outback Restaurant to this site. This will require an
agreement with Jade Pig and recorded by the two property owners within
60 days of site plan approval. (Condition of Site Plan Approval).
Planner Wash indicated that it appears that some of the Alpine Avenue
sidewalk is on private property. A public sidewalk easement should be
required from the developer prior to a building permit being issued.
(Condition of Site Plan Approval). Scott Conners stated that the
easement is shown on page 1 of the plans.
Wash related that the landscaping plan proposes significant aesthetic
improvements to the corner. Wash stated the Mugo Pine trees are
mini-trees. He suggested that they be changed to Old Gold Junipers
spaced at 4’ OC. The parking lot edge treatment goal is an evergreen
hedge of 36" (Condition of Site Plan Approval).
With regard to the architectural plans, the Old Orchard and Alpine
Avenue elevations have been amended to cover the walls with brick veneer
with the color "Olde Edmond", which is a traditional brick color with
reddish and dark gray hues. Wash felt that the color will match well
with the proposed "Deep Red" metal roof and the shingled roof.
Wash indicated that LED banding is proposed as a building accent
line. It is allowed by zoning ordinance if it remains constant and does
not blink, move or flash. (Condition of Site Plan Approval).
Wash indicated that two wall signs are proposed on the plan. Per
zoning ordinance, this site is allowed a total of 31.5 sq. ft. of wall
signage, based on a front building wall that is 63 feet long, and the
front wall, per code, is the Alpine Avenue wall. Permits are required
for all proposed signage. The accent lighting/banding functions as a
sign and a franchise branding tool. A 80 sq. ft. pylon sign is also
proposed near the road.
Scott Conners reviewed his staff report and related that all of the
comments from site plan review have been addressed. He indicated that
there was a problem with drainage on the Keller Ford site and detention
to the west was put in. Scott related that improvements to the east side
of the site include a "first flush" system.
Chairman Hickey asked how many parking spots the applicant is asking
for? Planner Wash related 170 parking spots instead of 226; they are
short 56 parking spots.
Member Brown asked how many parking spots does the Fire Mountain
Restaurant have? The appplicants stated 105.
Scott Reid, Processing Specialties, stated that he felt the delivery
truck templates will work out fine, and they will be receiving
deliveries in the early a.m.
Larry Weiland, director of Golden Corral real estate, was present on
behalf of the request. He related that based on his restaurants located
in Indianapolis, the average parking need is 150 spaces. Deliveries are
prior to 11:00 a.m. He felt that 170 spaces would be sufficient.
Chairman Hickey asked if the Planning Commission could approve the
site plan contingent on the variance being granted for reduced parking
and reduced setback on the north edge? Wash stated yes.
Member Byle stated that Old Orchard Street is 36’ wide. He asked if
there will be posted "no parking" signs along the curbed street where
parking is restricted? Planner Wash stated that employees should park on
the westerly edge of the parking lot.
Member Parent asked if the proposed restaurant size was typical?
Larry Weiland stated that they have an 8,000 sq. ft. and 11,000 sq. ft.
building layout, but they need the 11,000 sq. ft. building to meet
projected customer volume needs. The 8,000 sq. ft. building would be
much too small.
Planner Wash related that the architectural ordinance calls for the
roof-top HVAC to be shielded from public view.
Mike Soule, Project Manager, stated that they will be adding 100-150
jobs to the Walker area.
Larry Weiland felt that the Golden Corral will be something new and
exciting for the area.
Motion by C. Rypma, supported by T. Byle, to approve the submitted
site plans for a Golden Corral Restaurant at 3461 Alpine Ave., NW (PPN
41-13-02-230-007), as the plans do meet the standards set forth in the
City of Walker Zoning Ordinance, with the following Conditions of Site
Plan Approval:
The applicant agrees to all conditions noted in the City Planning
Director’s letter dated 8-12-09.
The applicant agrees to all conditions noted in the City
Engineer’s letter dated 8-12-09.
Condition: Approval based on approval of Zoning Board of Appeals
variances.
HVAC rooftop shields.
Motion carried unanimously. (6-0).
Commissioner and Staff Update
Frank Wash reviewed the September 2nd planning commission
agenda, including the Huntington Ridge RPUD.
Adjournment
Motion by A. Parent, supported by D. Brown, to adjourn at 9:20 p.m.
Motion carried.