Walker Home PageSite Map
Contact Us

 

 
Advanced Search

Click here for Income Tax Forms

Resources Section
Assessment Data/Property CharacteristicsBids and ProposalsBus ScheduleCalendar of EventsCity CharterConstruction UpdatesCounty Oil Drop SitesEmployment OpportunitiesForms and PermitsFrequently Asked QuestionsLatest NewsLinksMaps and DataMinutes and AgendasNew Business InformationNewsletterOrdinancesPublic NoticesREGIS Public MappingSchedule of FeesStrategic Plan

Minutes and Agendas
Overview  |  Building Board of Appeals  |  City Commission  |  Mineral Mining Review Board 
Planning Commission  |  Standale Downtown Development Authority  |  Zoning Board of Appeals
50th Anniversary Committee    
 

ZBA Minutes

MEETING
CITY OF WALKER
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Thursday, July 26, 2007
7:00 p.m.

The meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was called to order by Robert Marz, Chairman at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall 4243 Remembrance Rd., N.W., Walker, Michigan.

Members present: Robert Marz, Chairman; Roger Crabtree; Charles Deshaine; Tyler Korfhage; Beth Rogers; James Hickey; and John Tuffelmire, Alternate. Member absent: Randy Smith. Also present: John Stuyfzand, Building Department and Bonnie Antcliff, Recording Secretary.

DECISION AND ORDER

Legal Description

Property located at 3787 Remembrance Rd. also known on the tax rolls as 41-13-17-176-006. Hearing requested by Linda Peters.

The applicant’s request is to paint a 4 x 30 ft. sign on the side of the building which will make the total signage for the parcel 143 sq. ft. instead of the 121.5 sq. ft. allowed.

Finding of Facts

Robert Marz, Chairman reviewed the application and site plan submitted. No citizen appeared with respect to this request.

Linda Peters stated that 2 years ago when we bought this business we made a commitment to the City of Walker. She went on to say that we need the sign for visibility for those traveling down Remembrance Rd. The sign will improve the looks of the building. There is an empty lot next door. We maintain the 81 ft. plus 210 ft. frontage and our parking lot is on this frontage.

Churck Deshaine asked what the sign will look like?

Ms. Peters showed the Board what the sign will look like.

Tyler Korfhage stated that he did not think the application reads right. There is a sign on the northwest side of the building now that is about 4 x 30 ft. and the sign by the road is there and the applicant wants an additional sign on the side of the building so the total signage for the whole property will be approximately 240 sq. ft. If they are asking for 143 sq. ft., which is what the notice says, they are not asking for the right thing.

James Hickey stated that they already have well over 143 sq. ft. by taking the sign on the side of the building and the pylon sign that is out front. Now they are asking to build another sign on the southeast side of the building which will add another 120 additional sq. ft.

The Board concluded that this ordinance will be decided under the old ordinance as opposed to the new ordinance.

Ms. Peters stated that her lot description says she has 81 ft. of frontage. The parking lot and part of her playground is in the easement.

Motion

Roger Crabtree moved and Tyler Korfhage supported the motion to table the applicant’s request until August 23, 2007 to renotice this request for the total signage to read 240.5 sq. ft. instead of the 121.5 sq. ft. allowed.

Motion carried 7 to 0.

DECISION AND ORDER

Legal Description

Property located at 4089 Remembrance Rd. also known on the tax rolls as 41-13-07-426-14. Hearing requested by Pro Collision.

The applicant’s request is to be judged similar to the permitted use in the ML District to include the occasional sale of vehicles.

Finding of Facts

Robert Marz, Chairman reviewed the application and site plan submitted. No citizen appeared with respect to this request.

John Stuyfzand stated that car sales are only allowed in a C-4 District. They are asking to be judged similar to. Another similar situation was the Dykstra operation on 3 Mile.

James Hickey asked if this property is sold in the next 6 months could someone come in with a Class B license and make this a used car lot?

Robert Marz replied that they could with the same stipulations.

Charles Deshaine asked how are you going to advertise or display a vehicle for sale?

Mr. Shusta replied that he will probably not put a car out there but will bring it home and try to sell it there rather than try to sell it in front of a collision shop.

Roger Crabtree asked if these are vehicles that the applicant currently owns?

Mr. Shusta stated that he has courtesy vehicles that he owns.

Robert Marz, Chairman stated that if the applicant fixes a car and wants to go to the auction to sell it rather than retail it, or he goes to the auction and wants to buy something, he needs a license to do that. The State of Michigan requires that on premise you have a book of vehicles that you are listing under a Class B license and the State can come in at any time and examine that. It has to be approved by the local municipality and the license can be issued. He still has to abide by the City restrictions. He is looking to get a license and not necessarily sell vehicles from his business. He cannot ever go to an auction without a license.

John Stuyfzand stated that the Building Department recommends that the applicant be limited to number of cars and specify a specific location on the property.

Motion

James Hickey moved and Charles Deshaine supported the motion grant the applicant’s request to be judged similar to the permitted use in the ML District to include the occasional sale of vehicles.

The Board imposed the following conditions:

1. The applicant be limited to one car at a time and in the last parking spot to the east.

There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. We are requesting a C-4 zoning to be used along with our current ML zoning. We would like to obtain a Class B dealer’s license which in the auto industry ties together. This would allow us to replace our courtesy vehicles from time to time.

The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same zoning district and in the vicinity. Taber & Ottenwess repair, sells and retails. Riverbend Auto also has a dealer’s license.

Authorization of the variance will not be of a substantial detriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the intent and purpose of the ordinance or public interest in that the premises will look the same as it does now. One vehicle will be occasionally displayed.

The condition or the situation of the piece of property or the intended use of the property for which the variance is sought is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicle for the formulation of a general regulation. We are not opening or operating a used car lot.

Does not apply.

Motion carried 7 to 0.

Motion

James Hickey moved and Tyler Korfhage supported the motion to approve the Zoning Board of Appeals minutes of July 12, 2007.

Motion carried 7 to 0.

Motion

Roger Crabtree moved and Beth Rogers supported the motion to adjourn the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting at 7:55 p.m.

Motion carried 7 to 0.

___________________________

Roger Crabtree, Secretary

 

 

 

Government  |  Departments  |  Community  |  Resource Center
Contact Us  |  Search  |  Site Map  |  Home  |  
Site Use Policy

Bringing the World to Your Corner of the WorldThe City of Walker, Michigan
4243 Remembrance Rd. NW
Walker, MI  49534
(616)453-6311
City Hall hours: Mon-Thursday from 7:30am to 5:30pm. Closed Fridays
All information © 2012 City of Walker

Contact Us!
If you would like to leave general comments about the website, click here.
Click here to report technical problems with the website.